Thursday, November 28, 2013

RETURNED CITIZENS SYNDICATE

Greetings All,
 
"Returned" Citizen, I like the ring of that.  Frankly, my focus is more on the work at hand and not so much in convincing others what to call me.  EXIT-US is crazy supportive of so many activists and organizations working to transform Amerika's prison plantation industry.  We've been on the mic moderating candidate forums, on everyone's panel speaking power to truth, in everyone's photos with our fist raised high in defiance and in everyone's anti-establishment demonstration videos.  At this stage of the game, we are broke, tire and fed up!!
 
I challenge you Jondhi Harrell, Michael Tabon, Gerald Bolling, Malik Aziz, Mark Harrell, Wayne Jacobs, Michelle Simmons, William Goldsby, Hakim Ali, Michael Couch, Nathaniel Lee, Tara Timberman, Hannah Zellman, Frederica Hoffman, Jason Williams, Rueben Jones, Tracey Fisher, Muhammad Shakur, Karen Lee, Sarah Morris, Layne Mullet, Patricia Vickers, Connie Grier, Henry Demby, Tyrone Werts, Darryl Goodman, Barbie Fischer, Alif Allah, and the many other leaders who have experienced first hand the devastating consequences of mass imprisonment, to RISE UP!! 
 
We have access to SPACE and we all have the TROOPS ready to move out.  I am not talking about a pity party pow wow.  I'm suggesting an agenda directed plan of action with real teeth that deals with issues such as who is going to be the next governor of this state; and, how we can influence budgetary outcomes that determine resource allocation to our community.  Then we determine who becomes Philadelphia's next mayor in 2015. 
 
We are all Bosses; however, the success of this "Syndicate" needs to be about COLLECTIVE LEADERSHIP.  There will be plenty of work and responsibility to go around without us focusing on who is in charge of the entire process.  Plus, having a multi-leadership perspective prevents the opposition from targeting one person to destroy our movement (i.e. MLK & Malcolm X).  I look forward to receiving everyone's feedback. 
 
In Solidarity,
 
Thomas

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Philadelphia Schools Are Being Murdered, And Liberals Like It That Way

Newsworks
By Christopher Randolph
August 23, 2013


In "Letters from the Earth," Mark Twain differentiated between rotely mumbled Sunday prayers and "supplications of the heart," an individual's core desires and beliefs. In Twain's story a coal executive prays for the poor on Sunday and profits from their misfortunes the remainder of the week, having wished in his heart for a rise in coal prices regardless of social pain. The reader learns that Twain's angel clerks have been processing the deeper desires as the actual prayer.

As we witness the systematic murder of Philadelphia's public schools and the destruction of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, most self-identified liberals mumble kind words about the need for fairness to student and teacher alike, bright futures and equal education for all. It is evident that the knuckle-draggers in Harrisburg have an unreconstructed racist hatred and fear of all things urban, and my message is not for them. We can at least credit them with a crude honesty and credit slow-witted Gov. Tom Corbett with actions matching his rhetoric.

Rather, we need concern ourselves with the (neo)liberal, whose supplications of the heart manifest in a core belief that the African-Americans, Latinos and Asian-Americans who overwhelmingly populate urban districts were a lost cause at conception, and that these students are not deserving of anything approaching equitable education, especially if this would in any small way inconvenience real estate speculators. Beyond this, the liberal typically believes that urban teachers are not professionals, are not doing a "real job" in the "real world," and are not worth paying as they serve no useful social function.

The Democratic Party has now run Philadelphia longer than any single party held sway in any country of the Soviet bloc; it becomes impossible to hang the priorities manifested in its taxation, budgeting and expenditure on the admittedly nasty Republicans. Similarly it becomes impossible to state that the zombie march of registered Democrats to the polls overwhelmingly to elect and re-re-re-elect our native criminal class — often by pushing one button for all offices so as not to waste time reading each individual candidate's name — is the result of unfamiliarity with those priorities. The only conclusion is that, under it all, our gentle liberals, meek and mild, like what they see and want more of it.
 
Pew report anything but charitable
Moral and intellectual cripples at the Pew Charitable Trusts — God's own representatives on Earth in the local non-profit imbroglio — created a remarkable 2011 document titled "Closing Public Schools in Philadelphia: Lessons from Six Urban Districts." Similar in form and content to diagrammed accounts of the effective packing of slave ships, and to concentration camp blueprints, this sociopathic report formed the justification and path for the recent closure and consolidation of city schools.

Filled with bright colors and charts — charts mean we are doing science — the work is clearly that of pod people who know the price of everything and the value of nothing. If this is charitable, the Pew Indifferent Trusts must be scrawling messages of Lovecraftian horror.

Of the 44 recently proposed city public school closings, 25 schools had student populations 91 percent or more black; 33 were 83 percent or more black. All of this in a city with a 41 percent white population. Against this backdrop, liberal Philadelphia smugly self-congratulates for ushering in an era of post-racialism by electing an Obama and a Nutter. We can only hope someone has informed the students of these closed schools that racism has been defeated.
 
Strange standards, stranger priorities
The Pew report's central tenet is the normalization of almost comically overcrowded schools with minimum 33-student classrooms. The apparent preferred model for stacking brown children, as pioneered by our sharper military minds at Abu Ghraib, would take after my alma mater, the 3,600 student-packed Northeast High, where "only" 61 percent of the inmates are considered officially impoverished. Anything less than packing the maximum number of minorities into confined spaces, limited at present only by a mandate of the teachers union contract, is declared a "waste" of "surplus."

Northeast High has more than four times the number of students in an average American public high school, about six times the students in an average Pennsylvania public high, and several times the number of a suburban American public school. A Philadelphia public school has between double and triple the student-teacher ratio of a white suburban classroom; it is difficult to locate a suburban school Pew would keep open given their closure formula.

Against this backdrop we cut supervising adults and services even more, because they are for poor kids and because we can. Nowhere in the industrialized world, except in an American public school serving non-white populations, would maintaining the population density of a concentration camp be considered a driver of "surplus" buildings and "surplus" space.

Contrast the harsh requirements of Pew and SRC "percent utilization" overcrowding for city schools with the realities of our suburban public schools. The student-teacher ratio at Harriton High in Lower Merion School District is 10.6:1. It educates 1,050 students. If we assume that each class "should" have 33 students, Harriton should be closed because it doesn't serve 3,269 students. This is a lousy 32 percent utilization, clearly a "waste" of space and resources.

Too rich an area for reasonable comparison? Middle-class Abington High has 584 students with a student-teacher ratio of 16:1. Abington "should" squeeze 1,205 students into the building in classes of 33, and "should" be closed for its apparent miserable 48 percent utilization. Fortunately our suburban students, ironically in more heavily Republican-voting communities, are not subject to these calculations and attend schools with First World standards.
 
A Kafkaesque hypocrisy
Figure 4 of the Pew report, a timeline for shoving school closings into the collective rectum, tells us all we need to know about the commitment to democratic norms and basic fairness on the part of our best and brightest. December 2010 is listed as the time for "public input," followed by the February 2011 task of "public asked to focus on key priorities," dead corporate language translating as "sit down and shut up." Parents and teachers attempting to maintain their schools were not focused on key priorities, namely that they recognize themselves as surplus underclass population and go die. February 2012 is noted as "School Reform Commission expected to vote on closings" with June 2012 as "Some schools are closed" — because the notion of the SRC "voting" in any meaningful sense of the word is implicitly a bad joke. This is essentially a murder trial timeline with the execution date already written in ink, and the accused being asked to have faith in the process.

The 21-page report spends one-third of one page on the impact of closures on students, but several pages contain recommendations on propagandizing the population to accept blatant attacks on their communities and families. Suggestions include praise for Philadelphia's hiring of out-of-state vulture corporations URS Corp. and DeJong-Richter, who specialize in closing urban schools. For this, apparently, we have money. I am uncertain as to what specific skill set is required to lock the doors of a building and tell the locals to self-fornicate, but we are assured this is a job the city could not do alone.

Pew's massive hypocrisy comes partially in the form of its residence at One Commerce Square, a Center City office building that has struggled to maintain occupancy, and whose ownership filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protections in 2009, arguing that the value of the building is less than its debt obligation. All across Center City, office buildings have struggled with occupancy issues. In the face of these unused spaces, Philadelphia Democrats appealed to Harrisburg and received $47.25 million in tax breaks and incentives for Comcast to build the largest office building yet. Pew appears to have refrained from producing a brightly colored, chart-filled report detailing how they and other tenants need to move house so that offices might be consolidated and surplus buildings be sold off or razed.

The Trusts and their employees and works are, of course, supported through tax deductible donations, which by definition have weakened the very tax base that makes public school funding possible. "Closing Public Schools in Philadelphia" fails to mention this fact.
 
Defenders of the Left, but not the left-behind
Lest we believe the murder of public schools by urban liberals to be merely the result of incompetence, one should examine the ongoing push to break the Chicago teachers union by former Obama chief of staff and current mayor Rahm Emanuel. His efforts include the ultimate goal of stealing public pensions — about the only honestly accounted money left in America — and handing the money to the Democrats' criminal banker backers. In Chicago's case, this is through the dissolution of a long-standing pension board and its proposed reformation as a smaller body with a board majority named by ... Rahm Emanuel.

From Barack Obama on down to dogcatcher, the supposed party of the Left mouths soothing platitudes on the value of each child and of public education. In practice, the selection of Arne Duncan as Secretary of Education, the implementation of Race to the Top, and the continued devotion of public resources to massive charter school fraud are abundant proof of the supplication of the heart that public schools are an error to be eradicated. The liberal is enthusiastic for the sainted Obama, who would rather spend billions to scatter parts of a brown child on both sides of a Middle Eastern road than millions for the education of a brown child in this city. The liberal heart takes stock, is untroubled, and re-elects the fellow feeling no particular twinge of responsibility for either side of that equation.
 
The money is there
We see a claim that the city has no money for schools. Examining that claim reveals a different image; what we mean to say is that "the city" has abundant money for anything but the schools. The city forfeits over $100 million in school funding through a pure Reaganomics 10-year tax abatement scheme that represents clear and total class war, a transfer of wealth directly from the have-nots to the haves. Nowhere else in the industrialized world will one find a major city giving a total tax break to all new construction, no strings attached. Democrats have repeatedly weighed the convenience of someone constructing a $750,000 house in a gentrified neighborhood during a housing bubble against the necessity to educate the less desirable races and found the undesirables' needs lacking merit.

Beyond this the city has allowed $515 million of back property taxes to go uncollected, including upon 57,000 properties not occupied by owners, purely speculative investments. Democrats have repeatedly weighed the convenience of speculating tax scofflaws against the necessity to educate the less desirable races and found the undesirables' needs lacking merit.

The city has let $1 billion in forfeited bail go uncollected over decades. Democrats have repeatedly weighed the collection of bail monies even from absconded criminals against the necessity to educate the less desirable races and found the undesirables' needs lacking merit.

The city shovels as much as $6,700 monthly to vampire hags such as Marge Tartaglione and Joan Krajewski, in a warped and fraudulent system of pension for what we are told are temporary public service elective offices. Having balanced the needs of poor children against the ability of the city to further enrich public trough millionaire hogs, we again find the children's case lacking merit.

City gifts and grafts continue apace, with nary a concern for lack of funds: $400 million of borrowed money to the Eagles and Phillies for stadium construction, $9.5 million for a South Philly spy center, cars for City Council, an ice rink at City Hall.

So please stop telling me that we do not have money for schools and that you wish it were otherwise. We see only the manifestations of our community supplications of the heart. 

Friday, September 6, 2013

Why We Can't Wait to Address the Sleeping Giant of Mass Incarceration

Huffington Post
By Renaldo Pearson
September 05, 2013


On Father's Day (two months to the day after the 50th anniversary of the critically acclaimed "Letter from Birmingham Jail," written by my late fellow alumnus, Dr. King), I released an open letter, via Facebook, asking America to contemplate the question, "What best explains why there are so many black men and fathers missing from black households?" Or "What is the real reason behind the fact that, today, over half of all black children grow up in homes without a father?"

Today, in the wake of the events commemorating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, where Dr. King told the world of his "Dream," it is clear to me that that question is even more pressing now.

As I wrote in my open letter, the answer to that question is mass incarceration, where one-third of adult black men have been labeled felons for life, primarily through the now-glaringly unjust "War on Drugs." Indeed, in less than 30 years (since 1980), the penal population went from 300,000 to more than 2 million, with drug convictions accounting for the majority of the increase (two-thirds of the rise in the federal inmate population and more than half of the rise in state prisoners).

The fact of the matter is that, in urban America, black (and increasingly brown) men are disproportionately targeted, pursued, and arrested for a "crime" (mainly simple, nonviolent possession of marijuana -- a drug less harmful than both alcohol and tobacco) that goes largely unnoticed and unpunished when committed by whites (who, multiple studies show, actually use the same drugs at similar or higher rates) on college campuses and in suburban citadels across the country.

But the discrimination is not only on the front end of drug law enforcement, it's also on the back end -- that is, once these black men are labeled felons. As Michelle Alexander's (and I agree with Joshua DuBois, who
recently said that "Alexander may be this century's Harriet Beecher Stowe") eye-opening best-seller, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, makes us uncomfortably aware, once labeled felons, these men are permanently relegated to permanent second-class class citizenship. "They can be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and legally discriminated against in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits, much as their grandparents and great-grandparents were during the Jim Crow era." Alexander posits that "these men are part of a growing undercaste -- not class, caste."

In my open letter, I drew upon two piercing excerpts from King's Birmingham
letter to leave the reader with no uncertainty about where Dr. King would stand today with respect to the drug war. King said, "an unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself." He also said that "law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress." And, as I asked pointedly in my open letter, "Can we honestly say that disproportionately felonizing (given the aforementioned collateral consequences that come along with being branded a felon) entire communities of black men for these nonviolent 'offenses' is NOT 'block[ing] the flow of social progress'?
 
I proceeded to demonstrate the "fierce urgency of now" or "why we can't wait" (the theme King adopted 50 years ago in the run-up to the March on Washington, and the title of his 1963 book) in the context of the U.S. Census Bureau's 2043 minority-majority (or "plurality nation") projections. As I stated in the letter:
[T]here are only 12.6 million African American adult men today and one-third of them have already been labeled felons for life. If nothing is done, and these trends persist, we will have created a caste system unrivaled in modern history (one that would even make South Africa's past caste system of Apartheid seem like only a footnote in the history books), and unworthy of that 2043 minority-majority milestone (it would indeed be the ultimate irony).

What I omitted in this letter, but included in my subsequent open letter to Nelson Mandela, is the fact that the U.S. already incarcerates more black men than South Africa did during the height of apartheid. But, to give readers an idea of where we're headed if this sleeping giant of injustice goes unabated, I cited a 2012 report from United for a Fair Economy (UFE) that estimates that, if trends persist (based on all years of consistent available data between 1980 and 2010), 5 percent of the black population will be incarcerated by 2042 (more than doubling the current percentage). But, as I note:
[T]his number doesn't take into account the full felon population. So if the percentage of blacks 'incarcerated' doubles, I fret at the thought of what the percentage of blacks labeled 'felons' will look like by 2042. Over half of the adult black male population? (Remember, it's already at one-third!) If this is not reason enough to act, I'm not sure what is. Remember, in light of these new Census projections, we can no longer consider this a black problem, this now concerns the very future of America.
These numbers look even more grim when you consider the fact that there are 2.7 million more black adult women than black adult men (an unparalleled gender gap of 21.4 percent), or as noted in Alexander's book, the fact that most black men "in some urban areas have been labeled felons for life (in the Chicago area, the figure is nearly 80 percent)." It becomes clear, then, that mass incarceration is the single largest institutional threat to the black family.

But the fight to end mass incarceration is not only a moral imperative, it is also an economic imperative. In my open letter, I reference a 2011 report from The National Employment Law Project (NELP) that cites a survey done by the Society of Human Resources Management (the largest association of human resources personnel) in which over 90% of companies reported using criminal background checks for their hiring decisions, a statistic inextricably linked to the fact that "in 25 of the nation's largest metropolitan areas, fewer than 55 percent of working-age black males [are], in fact, employed." And, in the grand scheme of things (GDP), the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) estimates that, due to America's vast and growing ex-offender population, the American economy is already losing between $57 billion and $65 billion a year in lost output. Again, we don't want to know what these figures will look like by 2043 if mass incarceration, per the drug war, grows unabated.

Now, although last month we celebrated
two major victories in the fight against mass incarceration, one in the form of an announcement from Attorney General Holder that the Department of Justice will seek to curb stiff drug sentences, the other in the form of a federal court ruling rejecting New York's stop-and-frisk policy (both of which were welcome news to the Emerging Millennials Leadership Alliance -- whose founding was inspired by my "Father's Day Letter" -- especially in light of EMLA's preceding historic partnership with an unprecedented coalition, led by Dr. Boyce Watkins and Russell Simmons, of nearly 200 celebrities, athletes, elected officials, activists, advocates, academics, thought, faith, and business leaders, formed to encourage the Obama administration to #EndTheWarOnDrugs), we still have a LONG way to go (for a snapshot of what change looks like, see EMLA's "Founding Statement"). It is encouraging, however, to see Cory Booker's (one of the prospective members of EMLA's ad hoc Board of Advisors) announcement this week on his plans for drug war/criminal justice reform.

Having attended last Saturday's "National Action to Realize the Dream" march commemorating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, and having watched Wednesday's "Let Freedom Ring" ceremony commemorating the same, I was happy to see the many placards that called for an end to mass incarceration (although it was disturbing to hear that D.C. Park Police seized 200 of those placards from activists that were distributing them for free). But there wasn't enough talk about mass incarceration in the speeches at these events. As expected, there was great emphasis and repudiation (rightfully so) of the new wave of voting suppression, recently enabled by this summer's Supreme Court decision to gut the 1965 Voting Rights Act. But, as stated to the leading civil rights organizations, in EMLA's "Founding statement" (cited above), "we have a new caste system (mass incarceration) that has arisen out of the ashes of the last one (Jim Crow/segregation), which speaks directly to the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the second-class citizenship that it aimed to eliminate." So we must speak with equal vigor to this racial retrogression. We must get President Obama to see that the drug war makes the U.S. criminal justice system the single largest purveyor of racial injustice and oppression of our time.
With that, I'll conclude the same way I did in my open letter to Nelson Mandela, by echoing Sweet Honey in the Rock, in saying, "We who believe in freedom cannot rest until it comes."

Renaldo Michael Pearson is a Founding Fellow and President of the Emerging Millennials Leadership Alliance (EMLA), a recently founded human rights think tank and political action committee (PAC) whose overarching mission, predicated on the American ethic of egalitarianism, is to push America forward to transcend the lines that divide and embrace the ties that bind in order to preserve and perfect our union. Toward this end, EMLA's immediate objective is to force America to grapple with its persistent race problem by pushing the sleeping giant of mass incarceration to the fore of public consciousness. A 2011 alumnus of Morehouse College (the alma mater of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.), Pearson was recognized as 1 of 6 of the "most distinguished" men of the class of 2011 by Morehouse's newspaper, in its 2011 "Man of The Year" publication, and as the most "well spoken" member of the class of 2011 in the college's 2011 yearbook. He recently saw the culmination of a 5-year multifaceted effort, where he served at the vanguard, to secure President Obama as Morehouse's commencement speaker (a dream and plan that was fulfilled on Sunday, May 19, 2013). And he recently served as Research Assistant to Harvard Law Professor and Harvard Criminal Justice Institute Director, Ronald S. Sullivan Jr., and as Senior Advisor/Consultant in the 2012 Morehouse College Presidential Search Process.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

The Last Frontier For Public School Education
 

By Thomas Ford
September 04, 2013
 
Philadelphia is experiencing the finally stages of the devious scheme to transform "public" education into non-union, corporate controlled warehouse education. Both, democrats and republicans are in it together and they don't care that poor non-white parents will be sending their kids out to be devoured in unknown territory when school starts next week.

Building a 400 million dollar prison right outside of Philadelphia is no coincident?? This is where our children will be sent after they are convicted for protecting themselves on the way to and from school.

I pray for the political lynching of PA guv tom corbett, Phila mayor michael nutter and all the other charter school pushers who have jeopardized the safety and development of our children.

The SOLUTION, a city-wide boycott by the students and a strike by the teachers, both happening simultaneously!!

Parents, get your pitch folks and torches and take a stand for your children!

All the other cities threatened by corporate controlled lackey legislators will be watching Philly and many will follow our lead....

Friday, August 2, 2013

Philadelphia's Ex-Offender Expo: The Good, The Bad and The Very, Very Ugly

By Thomas Ford
August 2, 2013
 
I attended Philadelphia’s Citywide Ex-Offender Expo at the Pennsylvania Convention Center this past Tuesday July 30, 2013 and here are my observations as to what occurred during this event.  This was Mayor Michael Nutter’s second chance to host this year’s Citywide Career Fair after the May 17th event that nearly caused a riot in front of the city’s municipal building.   

At the first Fair, the police were called in and city officials closed the doors to approximately 5,000 returning citizens who showed up ready to seek employment.  Most of us from the convicted citizens’ community support the idea of folks receiving a second chance so we were willing to let bygones be bygones and see what Mayor Nutter would offer this time around.
  


 

Wali Smith, NAACP and Thomas Ford, EXIT-US at Philadelphia's Ex-Offender Expo
Photo Credit: Baba Bob Shipman
 
The first major decision Mayor Nutter made following his failure in May was to put William Hart, Director of Philadelphia's Office of Re-Integration Services for Ex-Offenders (R.I.S.E.) in charge of organizing and hosting the sequel event. 

The GOOD: Since the Expo took place at the city’s largest venue no one was turned away, contrary to what was written on RISE’s official website pertaining to mandatory pre-registration.  “3,200 prospective employees pre-registered”, according to LaMonte Williams of RISE, “and hundreds more were lining up at the door for on-site registration”. read  According to RISE Director Hart, less than ten business reps were available at the first Career Fair at the municipal building. 
 
While at the Expo, I counted 35-40 businesses that were onsite and actually accepting resumes or directing attendees to visit their websites to complete online applications. RISE’s outreach efforts to bring in reps from the Community College of Philadelphia and a much larger number of viable employment opportunities should be applauded.  RISE should also be commended for providing outreach opportunities for grassroots organizations such as Brothers Keepers ‘Hope’ Improvement, The Center for Returning Citizens, Gateway to Re-entry and the Public Safety Initiative’s Youth Entrepreneurship Program.   
 
          Philadelphia's Ex-Offender Expo, July 30, 2013
                          Photo Credit: Cherri Gregg
 
The BAD: Marketing this event as an Expo instead of a Career Fair drained resources and focus away from the original emphasis of actually getting returning citizens in Philadelphia employed.  To best serve the variety of needs of returning citizens, perhaps there should have been two events.  One event providing job readiness workshops and other supportive services and a second event to focus on actually getting “job ready” returning citizens employed.   

The outcome of combining these two foci in an Ex-Offender Expo caused minimal participation in the onsite support workshops and an overwhelming onslaught on the job providers.  The Expungement/Pardon Workshop was well received; however, attendance in the four remaining workshops was disappointing.   
 
Also, the Expo was far too political with too many shoulder slapping photo ops among those in attendance that see reentry as a parasitic business.  The fakers and shakers who treat returning citizens as a commodity to advance their bottom line were there in droves pushing their wares onto an unsuspecting audience.  The exhibition tables were interspersed in a large ballroom mixing services and job vendors together allowing the numbers of viable businesses that were actually hiring to be inflated.  It was disappointing that many company reps would not accept written applications and required attendees to go through the online application process.

What was even more disturbing were the companies onsite that were NOT hiring, telling attendees that they were there to provide “information”.  Really!  You come representing your company at a function geared toward providing folks employment opportunities, and you are not hiring?
 
The VERY, VERY UGLY: I was surprised not to see any city council members onsite to support this event which is concerning since the throngs of folks in attendance live in their districts.  When I visited City Council President, Darrell Clark’s Office a week and a half prior to the Expo, Clark's staff had not been contacted by RISE informing them of the date for the upcoming event.  Many city council members are stalwart supporters of returning citizens and they should have been included in this "citywide" affair. 

Mayor Nutter’s inability to forge collaborative relationships with folks outside of his office is a consistent character flaw of his administration. Of course, establishing these relationships go both ways.  However, if the Mayor wants to continue to hog the spotlight to take credit for all the improvements occurring in Philadelphia he must also accept responsibility for his lack of leadership when the city experiences setbacks.

Friday, July 26, 2013

Philadelphia Reintegration Services for Ex-Offenders (R.I.S.E.) The Umbrella of Cronyism

By Thomas Ford
July 26, 2013

Just received this official post (see below) from the City of Philadelphia website for R.I.S.E.
 
What's troubling is the folks that uploaded this propaganda failed to even proof-read their message.  And, RISE has never truly acted as an inclusive "umbrella organization for local ex-offender re-entry programs and initiatives" mainly because many of RISE's staff is unqualified and ill-equipped to accept this position of leadership. 
 
For example:
William Hart, hired as the Executive Director of RISE in 2011, was a crony appointment by Mayor Michael Nutter.  Before coming to RISE, Hart was Director of Community Employment at Temple University and had less experience working with ex-offenders than Wallace Custis, who was already employed at RISE and had extensive experience working with "ex-offenders" during his Staffing Specialist tenure at CareerLink's Workforce Development Corp.  Temple University has never been a beacon of hope in terms of providing services or hiring folks with a criminal history from Philadelphia's neighborhoods.


Not to be outdone by Mayor Nutter's cronyism, Hart recently hired RISE's Case Management Supervisor who has less college credentialed experience than the case managers she was hired to supervise.  According to a member of RISE's management team, the recently hired case management supervisor's basic writing ability and understanding of data collection applications is virtually non-existent. 
 
Yea, this is the "umbrella" Philadelphia's grassroots reentry programs must look to for leadership...So sad but so true. 
_________________________________________________________________________________
Welcome To R.I.S.E.


Transitioning the formerly incarcerated back into the community

The Mayor’s Office of Re-Integration Services for Ex-offenders (RISE) is the lead agency in the City for the management of reintegration services for the formerly incarcerated back into society.  At RISE we know that people who receive the skills and training and education necessary to complete in the formal economy are far less likely to participate in criminal activity.

The Mayor’s Office of Re-Integration Services for Ex-offenders (RISE) mission is to:

Improve public safety and the re-entry process for the formerly incarcerated enabling them to become responsible and productive Philadelphians by addressing barriers that impede their fair chance for success. 

RISE has established the following goals:
◾To act as an umbrella organization for local ex-offender re-entry programs and initiatives.
◾Establish a strong network of organizations to promote community-wide collaboration.
◾Assist in setting standards for organizations providing services to the formerly incarcerated.
◾Act as a clearing house of information and conduit for funding opportunities.
◾To provide training for both professionals and volunteers and assist with program development.


New Evidence Suggests the Black Teens Accused of Shooting White Baby Were NOT Involved!

By Micah Naziri and Stephanie Slifer
J



During the height of the Zimmerman trial, when media attention was focused heavily on Stand Your Ground Laws and the question of whether or not a white man would be found not guilty of killing an unarmed African-American teenager, the shooting death of 13 month old Georgia infant Antonio Santiago, also made national media headlines. After the mother, Sherry West, told police that her baby was killed by two black teenagers, the right-wing went crazy with this story. Meme’s about the killing could be found on every social media web-site, public page and in every group where the Trayvon Martin story was discussed. Most of these meme’s showed photos of the infant side by side with one of two accused African-American teenagers.

For months, right wingers have leveled accusations of reverse racism against the President, the Department of Justice and even the media, which did not touch the Trayvon Martin case until public outcry was so widespread that the media could not ignore the protests, rallies and celebrity calls for an arrest to be made. Never mind the fact that these youths were arrested immediately, as soon as they were fingered for the crime, rather than 45 days later. Never mind the fact that they never confessed to the killing as George Zimmerman did. Never mind the fact that unless the following – breaking – evidence is spread far and wide to demand a fair trial for these young men, they will almost certainly be convicted, in spite of all of the damning evidence that implicates the parents in the killing (as you will see).

In spite of the social media “outrage” and the right-wing media narrative, however, the Baby Santiago case only illustrates just how prevalent racism really is in the United States. Just days after Sherry West told police her 13 month old was shot and killed by two black teens, West’s 21 year old daughter went to police to tell them that she suspected her mother may have killed her infant brother.
Ashley Glassey told CBS News in March, that her mother has serious mental health issues. These include a diagnosis of bi-polar with accompanying schizophrenic tendencies. West also talked with the media about how she was removed from her mother’s care at the age of 8, because of abuse and neglect in the home.

Immediately after the shooting, Glassey said West began asking questions about how long it would take her to collect the insurance money. West’s daughter also told both media and police that her mother made conflicting statements to her, regarding the child’s death - including different stories about who was shot first. West’s inconsistencies and suspicious behavior caused her own daughter to tell police and reporters that she suspected her mother was not telling the truth about how the infant was killed. CBS News reported several days later that police had not followed up with Glassey, nor had they taken her statement. A follow-up call by the press to the police, was never returned.

In fact, both the father and mother of baby Santiago, had gunshot residue on them the day their son was killed, according to the state’s forensic report obtained by CBS affiliate WTEV.

While the fact that Sherry West, the baby’s mother, was also shot during her son’s killing could explain why residue was found on her, it is unclear how or why the baby’s father, Louis Santiago, would have been exposed to gunshot residue.

A conclusion from the state forensic report says, “This supports the possibility that [Louis Santiago] discharged a firearm, was in close proximity to a firearm upon discharge, or came into contact with an item whose surface bears GSR [gunshot residue].”

According to the station, Louis Santiago is currently in jail on charges of aggravated stalking. An arrest warrant from June 6 reportedly says Santiago was stalking Sherry West, in violation of police orders. He was reportedly convicted of the same charges in another case from 2009.
West claims Santiago “went nuts” in the months following their son’s murder and violated a restraining order, according to the station.

“He was throwing things through the window and terrorizing me, saying that I killed my baby and it should have been me,” West told the station.

West claims that she was walking her baby by herself when two teens, De’Marquise Elkins and Dominique Lang, tried to rob her at gunpoint on a Brunswick sidewalk. The teens allegedly shot her in the leg and baby Antonio in the head. Both are behind bars on charges of murder and are scheduled to stand trial next month.

On July 16th this new evidence was released to the public that implicates the parents involvement in the child’s death. Police tests immediately following the shooting revealed gun powder on the hands of both Sherry West and the baby’s father, Louis Santiago. Santiago claimed that he was nowhere near the scene of the shooting. This evidence too, was withheld for months, until the defense attorney in the case demanded that it be released in mid July.

When we look at the Zimmerman case and the Baby Santiago case side by side, what we see is how racism plays out in the United States. When a white man openly admitted to shooting and killing an unarmed black teenager, the public immediately jumped to his defense. On the other hand, when two black teenagers were accused of shooting and killing a white child, the public immediately cried out for their executions. The horrifying tale of an infant murdered in cold blood by heartless black youths was readily accepted by vast numbers of Zimmerman’s supporters.

Evidence in the Baby Santiago case seems to point more and more toward the fact that the two black youth accused of this shooting are innocent of the crime they’ve been blamed for. Yet their pictures have been plastered all over social media, and they’ve been labeled  as “baby killers” – a favorite phrase of the right-wing since the day of the shooting. Can we hope that there will be a fair trial for these youth? Can we hope that our justice system will not continue to convict the innocent, while allowing the guilty to go free? Can we hope that the media will report fairly and accurately on this case? Can we hope that the Georgia court system will be fairer and more just than the one in Florida?

And what of Sherry West? If it turns out that a southern white women did in fact kill her own infant in order to collect some insurance money, will American’s show the same level of vehemence they did when they believed it was two black teens who killed Antonio Santiago? Will they still cry out for execution, or will they see the case differently, if the killer turns out to be middle-aged, white and female, rather than young, black and male?

And then there is the question of the jurors. Will there be another jury of all white women, women who have to choose between two scenarios; Did a soft-spoken white, southern woman (whom they surely can identify with) actually shoot her own infant – or the alternative, did two black hoodlum gangsters try to rob her, killing her baby in the process? Can such a jury be found in Georgia that is able to set aside their underlying stereotypes about women, about blacks, about society and of course, about themselves, to listen to facts, examine evidence and come to a just decision?

Racism is a threat to every American. The Baby Santiago case may prove that it’s not just the African-American population or the Latino population or the Muslim population, that suffers the consequences. If something does not change, murderers will continue to go free, while innocent people’s lives are destroyed. If our underlying belief system continues to reinforce the idea that the black person is always the guilty party, there’s little to stop people like Sherry West and George Zimmerman, from committing murders of teenagers and even toddlers of any color, having full confidence that as long as they implicate a black person, no-one will even question their innocence.